PDA

View Full Version : Travel guide slams 'tatty' England


pixy75
03-15-2004, 09:46 AM
Guide to rough England
By Steve Daughty, Social Affairs Correspodent, Daily Mail
12 March 2004

To Shakespeare, England was 'this other Eden, this demi-paradise'. But not these days, if the latest edition of a best-selling tourist book is to be believed.

In a series of scathing assessments, The Rough Guide savages towns, cities and seaside resorts with descriptions that will have potential visitors giving them a wide berth.

Southampton and Plymouth, it says, have 'especially hideous examples' of post-war centres.

Because of its large number of retired folk, 'drab and moribund' Herne Bay in Kent is often called Hernia Bay. As for Dover, the white cliffs look grey and the town is best viewed from out at sea.
But the editors of the sixth edition of the Rough Guide to England insist their verdict is upbeat and does justice to both the ancient attractions and the modern vitality of many places.

Yet the criticisms will hurt. Herne Bay, it says, is 'a relic from a bygone age when holiday-makers believed sitting on a wind-blasted patch of shingle and sand was something to look forward to'. Weston- super-Mare, Somerset, is 'rather moth-eaten' and Southend 'has little to raise the spirits'. Dover doesn't 'have what it takes to induce many travellers to linger'. Pollution 'has taken some of the edge of the whiteness' of the cliffs, and 'the best views are to be had from several miles out to sea'.

Portsmouth's tower blocks are 'from the nadir of British architectural endeavour' and Southampton is 'a sprawling conurbation easily bypassed by motorways'.

Wolverhampton 'doesn't win any beauty contests', while Bradford 'doesn't have the architectural heritage or the cultural interest to detain you long'.

Coventry is 'lumbered with more than its fair share of unsightly buildings' and Derby is 'unexciting'.

The guide's author, Phil Lee said: 'Not all English towns are worth a visit.' But many have shaken off bad reputations, he added.

Hull has excellent historic pubs, Liverpool is becoming brighter - thanks to the regeneration of its centre and docks - and Birmingham has long outgrown the squalor and misery of its boom years.

'Many of England's cities and towns have been busy revamping themselves, defeating long-held stereotypes.'

Last night, the places derided by the guide hit back. Dover councillor Paul Watkins said: 'The comments are very hurtful and for no apparent good reason.


http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifeand....tandard (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifeandstyle/articles/9619055?source=Evening+Standard)
Thats a bad guidebook http://kousa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif

pixy75
03-15-2004, 09:49 AM
Quote[/b] (pixy75 @ Mar. 15 2004,10:46)]Coventry is 'lumbered with more than its fair share of unsightly buildings' and Derby is 'unexciting'.
As for coventry and derby, those comments are true http://kousa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif

mattydonaldson
03-15-2004, 03:45 PM
<font color='#810541'>its no surprise. all the cities he has described were the ones which took the full force of the battle of britain. Thats prob why they look so post war. The cities had a choice between providing good healthcare and unemployment benefits to those returning from the war, or build nice fancy buildings that would impress some idiot writing a book becuase he has no qualifications to actually get a real job. Anyone could write a frigging travel book, and this bloke has done it poorly

pixy75
03-17-2004, 04:37 PM
I agree, matty. This autor is ignorant http://kousa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif
I think Liverpool is pretty beautiful.